India 455 and 204 (Kohli 81, Broad 4-33, Rashid 4-82) lead England 255 (Stokes 70, Bairstow 53, Root 53, Ashwin 5-67) by 404 runs Scorecard and ball-by-ball detailsStuart Broad led Englands fight on the fourth morning at Visakhapatnam with a valiant eight-over spell of skilfully varied legcutters, while Adil Rashid picked off four wickets with his legspin, including the key scalp of Virat Kohli for 81. However, a spiky tenth-wicket stand of 42 in 9.4 overs between Jayant Yadav and Mohammad Shami carried India to a psychologically imposing lead of 404, on a pitch that is now beginning to misbehave appreciably.Still, England will take even the pyrrhic victories as they settle into the sort of mindset that they will need if they are to salvage this match and the series, and in claiming seven wickets, irrespective of the match situation, this was still their session.It began with India on 98 for 3, with Kohli ominously placed on 56 not out, and targeting his second century of an outstanding captains performance. But following on from his defiant opening gambit on the third afternoon, and buoyed by the confirmation that his foot injury is not as severe as he might have feared, Broad produced one of his most skilful spells of a stellar year, manipulating the old ball with cut and cross-seamers, and a variety of angles on the crease, to prise out two vital wickets, and come close to several more.His first victim was Ajinkya Rahane, who was never allowed to settle in the course of his 26. Lined up by Broads angle into the toes and sharp jag away, he was beaten by some fierce lift on a good length, and spliced a looping edge to Alastair Cook at slip.One over later, R Ashwin was given a brief reprieve when umpire Rod Tucker failed to spot a thick inside-edge as Broad jagged one back into his pads - the lbw verdict was over-turned by DRS. However, he had added just one more single when Broad found his edge again - the outside one this time - for Jonny Bairstow to gather a thin snick behind the stumps.Rashid by now had replaced James Anderson at the opposite end, and picked up where he had left off in his previous spells of an encouraging allround display. He was unafraid to toss the ball up, knowing that India would have to come after him if they wanted to press their innings on, and that gave his variations a chance to grip and bite.Wriddhiman Saha fell to his first ball from Rashid, a well-disguised googly that would have been clipping leg stump, and though Ravindra Jadeja got hold of one mighty swing for six over long-on, even Kohli found Rashids sharp turn hard to dominate. An ambitious drive outside off took a thick and fast edge, whereupon Ben Stokes took off at slip to cling onto a photographers dream of a catch, high to his right in one hand.Broad, who had come close to pinning Kohli lbw in his previous over, was then edged low through the slips for four by Jayant Vadav to signal the end of his stint, but Rashid was not yet done. Jadejas aggression proved his downfall as picked out Moeen Ali at deep midwicket before Bairstow pulled off his most impressive take of the match to dismiss Umesh Yadav, a fast and high edge off another Rashid legbreak that all but lodged in his armpit.However Jayant, continuing his impressive allround game, kept England waiting as lunch was delayed in pursuit of the tenth wicket, and Englands frustrations were visible when Shami joined in the fun, hoisting Rashid for two towering sixes in his 19 from 22 balls. It took a change of bowling to end the fun, with Moeen Ali striking with his first delivery to have Shami stumped with his toe on the crease. Nike Air Max 1 . During the athletes parade, the 23-strong Ukrainian team was represented by a lone flagbearer in an apparent protest at the presence of Russian troops in Ukraines Crimean peninsula. Nike Air Max 1 2021 .Y. - Detroit goaltender Jonas Gustavsson has earned NHL first star of the week honours after winning in his first three appearances of the season. https://www.cheapairmax1store.com/ . Varlamov made 33 saves and Ryan OReilly had a goal and scored in the shootout as the Avalanche beat the New Jersey Devils 2-1 on Thursday night. Nike Air Max 1 2020Cheap Nike Air Max 1 . While hell be dialed in to that tournament on a course he loves, you can forgive him if his eyes glance down the calendar just a bit, towards April. The College Football Future Power Rankings project?was created to answer the following question: Which college football programs will win the most in the next three seasons? We did not determine winning by simply running a win total projection, but instead as the teams with the best chances to contend for and win conference and national championships in the 2016, 2017 and 2018 seasons.To answer the question, we had our panel of experts -- Heather Dinich, Brad Edwards, Travis Haney, Sharon Katz, Tom Luginbill, Ted Miller, Adam Rittenberg and Mark Schlabach -- rate college footballs top teams from 1 to 10 (1 being the worst, 10 being elite and 5 being average) in five different categories: coaching, current talent, recruiting, title path and program foundation. Here are the criteria for each category and the value of each category as it pertains to the overall rankings:1. Coaching:?This section?covers each part of a teams coaching staff during the next three years, with a primary focus on the head coach. Stability matters, as panelists took into account the possibility of coaching changes when rating each team.2. Current Talent:?This section consists not only of the players on teams two-deep rosters for the 2016 season, but the young players already in the program who might not have an impact until 2017 or 2018. It takes into account the possibility of early NFL draft departures that could affect teams rosters in 2017 and 2018.dddddddddddd3. Recruiting:?There are two components to this section: players already committed and targeted for the 2017 class, and each teams general recruiting trajectory and momentum.4. Title Path:?In this section we are answering the question -- How likely is this team to play for conference and national championships? -- by doing two things: measuring the level of resistance a team will encounter and lowering its rating accordingly, and measuring the likelihood that a team could be selected for the four-team playoff and increasing its rating accordingly.5. Program?Foundation:?This section takes into account factors such as program history, fan and school support, resources, facilities, recent and historical success, and any other factors (e.g., NCAA sanctions) that affect the chances for a team to continue to win in the next three seasons.We then averaged each panelists votes together to give every team a single score in each category from 1 to 10, and weighted them based on importance. The weighted category averages were then added up and represented on a 100-point scale to create the final team score. It was based on those scores that we produced our top 25 rankings for the next three seasons. ' ' '